China Sea-Cargo Loss, Damage or Delay: How Can Foreign Cargo Interests Claim?

1. Immediate answer: preserve notice, survey evidence and the one-year period first

This guide concerns a foreign shipper, consignee, bill holder or subrogated insurer pursuing loss, damage or delay connected with sea carriage from or to a Chinese port. A sale claim for non-conforming goods, a packing claim against the supplier, a freight-forwarding mandate, destination-port handling and cargo insurance may run in parallel, but they are not the same cause of action or necessarily against the same defendant.

On day one, notify the contractual or actual carrier in writing, request a joint or independent survey before unpacking or repair changes the evidence, preserve the container, seal, temperature and handover records, and calculate the one-year long-stop. An insurance notification, platform complaint, commercial claim and commencement of court or arbitration proceedings do not perform identical functions.

2. When the revised PRC Maritime Code applies

Article 295 provides that Chapter IV applies to an international contract of carriage of goods by sea where the loading or discharge port is in China. Other questions may still engage the parties' chosen law, the law of closest connection, a treaty, the arbitral seat or forum procedure. The cargo owner's home country, the vessel flag or the insurer's location does not by itself answer every applicable-law question.

The Supreme People's Court's Interpretation Fa Shi [2026] No. 8 deals with facts and contracts spanning 1 May 2026. Post-commencement facts use the revised Code; continuing facts generally do too, subject to specific rules for cross-period contract performance, electronic transport records and suspension or interruption of limitation. Do not apply the new text mechanically to an older voyage simply because proceedings start now.

3. Map the parties before naming a carrier

Article 44 distinguishes the carrier contracting in its own name from an actual carrier entrusted to perform all or part of the receiving, loading, moving, stowing, carrying, caring for, unloading or delivery functions. A liner, NVOCC, terminal or other operator may appear across the booking, house bill, master bill, arrival notice and invoices. Check who issued each document, received freight and actually controlled the cargo.

Articles 61–65 generally keep the contracting carrier responsible for the full carriage and extend the statutory carrier rules to the actual carrier. They may be jointly liable within their respective responsibility, while aggregate recovery remains capped. A named-segment clause, bill notation, good-faith third party and period of actual custody can change the analysis; a ship name or destination agent alone does not identify the correct respondent.

4. The notice matrix: delivery, 7 or 15 days, and 60 days

Articles 88–92 require notice at delivery for apparent loss or damage. Latent damage should be notified within seven consecutive days after delivery for non-container cargo or fifteen consecutive days for container cargo. Failure normally makes sound delivery prima facie evidence; it is not expressed as an automatic extinction of every damage claim. A joint inspection at delivery removes the need for a duplicate notice about what was jointly established.

Delay loss is different. If the carrier does not receive written notice of economic loss from delay within sixty consecutive days after delivery, Article 89 removes carrier liability for that loss. Record the delivery, unstuffing and discovery dates, the precise addressee and proof of receipt. Notice to the seller, platform or insurer is not automatically notice to the carrier.

• At delivery: reserve apparent shortage, damage, packaging, seal and temperature issues in writing.
• Within 7 or 15 consecutive days: supplement latent damage and survey findings; do not wait for a final repair quotation before first notice.
• Within 60 consecutive days: identify delay-related storage, shutdown, substitute carriage or other economic loss separately.
• Within one year: allow time for forum, arbitration, translation, service, security and preservation work.

5. Calculate liability, defences, value and limits separately

Articles 47–55 first ask whether the loss occurred during the carrier's responsibility period and whether seaworthiness and careful handling duties were met, then address nautical fault, fire, sea peril, government action, deficient packing, inherent vice and concurrent causes. Container cargo is generally covered from receipt at the loading port to delivery at the discharge port; non-container cargo is generally covered from loading to discharge. Stuffing, stowage, refrigeration, seals, storage and last-mile allocation matter to causation.

Articles 56–60 distinguish actual value from liability limits. Loss or damage is generally valued by the market at delivery, or if unavailable by shipment value plus insurance and freight, less saved expense. The ordinary ceiling is the higher of 666.67 SDR per package or other shipping unit and 2 SDR per kilogram gross weight. Delay-only economic loss is generally capped at the freight for the delayed cargo. Declared value, bill package wording and intentional or recklessly knowing conduct can alter the limit analysis.

China commercial disputes and recovery →

6. A demand may interrupt time, but it is not a filing plan

Article 284 generally gives a one-year limitation period for carriage-of-goods claims against a carrier or actual carrier, running from delivery or when delivery should have occurred. Article 294 allows a performance demand, litigation, arbitration, an admission of performance obligation or an application for ship arrest to interrupt time, after which time runs afresh from the interruption or end of the proceeding. Cross-period claims require the SPC Interpretation's rule based on when the interrupting event occurred.

Interruption is not an admission of liability and does not cure a wrong defendant, ineffective arbitration agreement, wrong court or departed ship. The SPC's case-scope rules assign sea-carriage, related international multimodal and connected tort claims to the maritime courts. Before using China proceedings, confirm the competent maritime court, arbitration clause, respondent registration, vessel or asset lead and the practical cost of security.

7. Build the evidence by purpose and mitigate without destroying proof

Parties and contract: booking confirmation, freight agreement, front and reverse of the HBL and MBL, electronic transport record, carrier terms, freight payment, vessel and agent data. Cargo condition: invoice, packing list, stuffing images, seal, VGM, temperature or humidity data, tally and handover records. Delivery and loss: arrival notice, delivery order, exception report, unstuffing video, joint or independent survey, repair and salvage valuation. Deadlines: the full notice, attachments, timestamps, delivery route and receipt confirmation.

Do not discard packaging, commingle cargo, repair it or sell salvage before giving the other side a fair survey opportunity. At the same time, take reasonable mitigation steps and notify the cargo insurer within the policy period. Preserve a separate sale-contract claim if the Chinese supplier's packing, stuffing or delivery was also defective. Seek maritime advice promptly where the amount is material, the vessel may depart, preservation value is falling or the one-year date is close.